Bonne fête du Canada Matawa Fête du Canada Fin des fêtes du Dominion . Happy pre Canada day 1 day before 2024
Sunday, 30 June 2024
Wednesday, 26 June 2024
Tuesday, 25 June 2024
Monday, 24 June 2024
Sunday, 23 June 2024
Great Guy TV Art
Blog links
Links
Links
https://
Rich posts
Cyber security
Saturday, 22 June 2024
Wednesday, 19 June 2024
How to Use Instagram Beginners Guide in 2024
When you use the Music sticker on Instagram, you can add a song directly to your Story or Reel to complement your content with a soundtrack. Here’s how it typically works:
Selecting a Song: When you open the Music sticker in Instagram, you can search for a specific song or browse through various categories like Popular, Moods, and Genres.
Adding to Your Story or Reel: Once you find the song you want, you can preview it to make sure it fits your content. After selecting the song, it will appear as a sticker on your Story or Reel.
Playback: Viewers can tap on the music sticker to see the song title and artist. They can also listen to a 15-second preview of the song. If they have Spotify linked to their Instagram account, they can listen to the full song by tapping the "Play on Spotify" button.
Visual Effects: Instagram automatically generates visual effects that respond to the music’s beat and mood, adding a dynamic element to your content.
Sharing and Engagement: Adding music enhances viewer engagement and can make your content more enjoyable and immersive. It's a great way to set the tone, convey emotions, or simply add a fun element to your Story or Reel.
The Music sticker allows you to share your favorite songs or discover new music with your audience, enhancing the overall experience of your Instagram content.
Instagram tutorial #7
When you use the Music sticker on Instagram, you can add a song directly to your Story or Reel to complement your content with a soundtrack. Here’s how it typically works:
Selecting a Song: When you open the Music sticker in Instagram, you can search for a specific song or browse through various categories like Popular, Moods, and Genres.
Adding to Your Story or Reel: Once you find the song you want, you can preview it to make sure it fits your content. After selecting the song, it will appear as a sticker on your Story or Reel.
Playback: Viewers can tap on the music sticker to see the song title and artist. They can also listen to a 15-second preview of the song. If they have Spotify linked to their Instagram account, they can listen to the full song by tapping the "Play on Spotify" button.
Visual Effects: Instagram automatically generates visual effects that respond to the music’s beat and mood, adding a dynamic element to your content.
Sharing and Engagement: Adding music enhances viewer engagement and can make your content more enjoyable and immersive. It's a great way to set the tone, convey emotions, or simply add a fun element to your Story or Reel.
The Music sticker allows you to share your favorite songs or discover new music with your audience, enhancing the overall experience of your Instagram content.
Instagram offers several music-related stickers that users can use in their Stories and Reels to enhance their content with musical elements. Here are some of the main music-related stickers available:
Music Sticker: Allows you to add a specific song to your Story or Reel, complete with a visual representation of the song's title and artist. Viewers can tap to listen to a preview or play the full song on Spotify if linked.
Lyrics Sticker: Displays song lyrics on your Story or Reel, synchronized with the music playing in the background. You can customize the style and appearance of the lyrics.
Music Quiz Sticker: Lets you create a quiz with questions related to music. Viewers can answer multiple-choice questions about songs or artists.
Music Donation Sticker: Enables viewers to donate to a music-related cause or charity directly from your Story.
Live Room with Music: Allows you to go live with up to three guests and use music during the broadcast. Viewers can request to join the live room and interact with music-related content in real-time.
These stickers enhance engagement and allow users to share their love for music creatively on Instagram.
Ask Ed...heat alert
Ontario, Canada, a heat alert typically indicates that the temperatures are dangerously high, which can pose health risks, especially to vulnerable populations like infants. Here's a breakdown of safety and legality considerations:
Tuesday, 18 June 2024
The Ever-Shifting Sands of Adulthood: A Logic Blog
A Logic Lesson - The Ever-Shifting Sands of Adulthood: A Logic Blog
Here's the scoop on why adolescence keeps getting longer:
Imagine a world without teenagers. Young people weren't stuck in this limbo, neither child nor adult. History buffs call them "younkers," "ephebes," or even "backfischs," depending on the era and location. Back then, they transitioned into adulthood quicker, helping out with chores and maybe even learning a trade.
Fast forward to today's scene. We've got a whole new category: teenagers! They're stuck in school longer, bombarded by commercials for the latest stuff, and let's be honest, sometimes acting a bit more childish than those historical "younkers."
So, what gives? Why is adolescence stretching out like a never-ending piece of bubblegum? Buckle up for a breakdown of the reasons, complete with Evidence (E), Point (P), and Explanation (PE) to make things clear.
Evidence 1 (E): Historical context matters. Back in the day, life was simpler. Less schooling was needed, and kids often pitched in with work early on. (P): This suggests the concept of adolescence is shaped by historical context. (PE): Basically, what it meant to be a "young person" depended on the times.
Evidence 2 (E): Society's attitudes and commercial interests play a big role. Schools kept kids in learning mode longer, and businesses saw teenagers as a new target audience with money to spend. (P): This implies social attitudes and commercial interests shape the idea of adolescence. (PE): Society decided kids should stay in school, and businesses saw an opportunity to sell them stuff.
Evidence 3 (E): Science is weighing in too. Brain development research shows our noggins keep maturing well into our twenties. (P): This suggests brain development research informs our understanding of adolescence. (PE): Turns out, teenagers might not be quite as "adult" as we thought because their brains are still under construction.
Putting the Pieces Together:
Now, let's connect the dots. Historical context (E1) influenced the idea of adolescence, and today's extended education and marketing focus (E2) are further prolonging this phase (G). This extended adolescence (G), coupled with the new knowledge about brain development (E3), is leading to a rethink of what it means to be an "adult" (I). Maybe 18 isn't the magic number it used to be.
The Bottom Line:
Teenagers are a relatively new invention – a product of our times, shaped by education, society's views, and even a dash of marketing. As the world keeps changing, who knows what the future holds for this in-between stage of life?
So, the next time you see a teenager glued to their phone, rocking the latest trends, or maybe just acting a little out of sorts, remember, it's not their fault. They're just navigating this ever-evolving phase called adolescence, a product of our ever-changing world.
Symbolic proof
A = Adolescence has evolved significantly over time B = Young people were integrated into adult society earlier in history C = Terms like "younker", "ephebe", and "backfisch" were used to describe young people in the past D = Emergence of the modern teenager E = Extended education and changing social attitudes contributed to this shift F = Commercial interests played a role in creating the teenager as a distinct demographic G = Adolescence is prolonging H = Brain development research suggests adolescence may extend beyond teenage years I = Recognition of a distinct demographic group, "adolts", for those between 18 and 25 Argument: A ∧ B ∧ C → D (Historical context implies emergence of modern teenager) D → E ∧ F (Emergence of modern teenager implies extended education and commercial interests) E ∧ F → G (Extended education and commercial interests imply prolonging adolescence) G ∧ H → I (Prolonging adolescence and brain development research imply recognition of "adolts") Implicit premises: Historical context influences the concept of adolescence Social attitudes and commercial interests shape the notion of adolescence Brain development research informs our understanding of adolescence Formal argumentation: Premise 1: A ∧ B ∧ C Premise 2: A ∧ B ∧ C → D Conclusion 1: D Premise 3: D Premise 4: D → E ∧ F Conclusion 2: E ∧ F Premise 5: E ∧ F Premise 6: E ∧ F → G Conclusion 3: G Premise 7: G Premise 8: G ∧ H → I Conclusion 4: I Note: ∧ represents logical conjunction (AND), → represents material implication (IF-THEN), and → represents logical implication (IMPLIES).
PS Final Document in Plebian English
Imagine a time, not so long ago, when teenagers weren't a thing. Young folks weren't stuck in this weird in-between stage, not quite kids, not quite adults. Back then, they had different names - "younkers," "ephebes," even "backfischs" depending on where you were. They learned the grown-up ways early, pitching in with chores and maybe even a trade.
Fast forward to today, and what do you see? A whole new breed: teenagers! Stuck in school longer, bombarded by ads for the latest trends, and well, let's be honest, acting a little more childish than those "younkers" of old.
So, what happened? Well, buckle up for a whirlwind tour of the reasons why adolescence seems to be dragging on forever.
First, the world changed. Times got more complicated, requiring more schooling to navigate the job market. Plus, society decided it wasn't so cool to have kids working the fields at 12 anymore (good thing!).
Second, someone figured out teenagers were a goldmine. Shiny gadgets, catchy tunes, the latest fashions - suddenly, there was a whole industry built around this new "demographic."
All this schooling and marketing combined to push back adulthood. It turns out, our brains keep developing well into our twenties. Who knew? This new understanding is making folks rethink when someone truly becomes an "adult." Maybe 18 isn't quite the magic number it used to be.
The point is, this whole "teenage years" thing is a relatively new invention. It's a product of our times, shaped by education, social attitudes, and yes, even a little bit of clever marketing. And as things keep changing, who knows what the future holds for this strange in-between stage of life?
So, the next time you see a teenager glued to their phone, sporting the latest fashions, or maybe just acting a little immature, remember, it's not their fault. They're just navigating this weird, ever-evolving stage of life called adolescence.
Here are some potential logical fallacies in the argument:
- Historical determinism: The argument assumes that historical context solely determines the concept of adolescence, neglecting other factors that may influence its evolution.
- False dichotomy: The argument presents a binary view of adolescence (historical vs. modern), overlooking possible variations and nuances within each period.
- Correlation implies causation: The argument links extended education and commercial interests to the emergence of the modern teenager without establishing a clear causal relationship.
- Slippery slope: The argument implies that recognizing a new demographic ("adolts") will inevitably lead to significant changes in how we support and understand young people's development, without providing evidence for this consequence.
- Appeal to science: The argument relies heavily on brain development research to support its claims, potentially overlooking other perspectives or evidence that may challenge its conclusions.
- Lack of clear definitions: The argument uses terms like "adolescence" and "modern teenager" without precise definitions, which may lead to confusion or misinterpretation.
- Oversimplification: The argument simplifies complex historical and social phenomena, potentially neglecting important context and nuances.
- Assuming a single cause: The argument attributes the prolonging of adolescence solely to extended education and commercial interests, neglecting other potential factors that may contribute to this trend.
By acknowledging and addressing these potential fallacies, the argument can be strengthened and made more robust.
HUMILIATING: Gen-Z Can't Answer the Most Basic Questions
Cultural Stereotypes About Boomers
Stereotypes about the Baby Boomer generation (born approximately between 1946 and 1964) often paint them in a broad, sometimes unflattering light. However, these generalizations don't capture the complexity and diversity within this demographic. Let's examine some common stereotypes, their origins, and evidence supporting or debunking them.
Technologically Inept
- Stereotype: Boomers are often seen as struggling with modern technology.
- Evidence: While Boomers might not be digital natives, many have adapted to new technologies. A Pew Research Center report found that 68% of Boomers use smartphones, and 82% use the internet .
- Nuance: While they might not use technology as intuitively as younger generations, many Boomers are proficient with it, particularly in professional settings.
Financially Secure and Economically Privileged
- Stereotype: Boomers are often perceived as having had greater economic opportunities and more financial security than subsequent generations.
- Evidence: Boomers did benefit from post-WWII economic prosperity. A Federal Reserve report showed that Boomers hold a significant portion of the nation's wealth, particularly in home ownership and retirement savings .
- Nuance: Not all Boomers are financially secure; many face economic challenges, including those without retirement savings or with high medical expenses.
Resistant to Change and Innovation
- Stereotype: Boomers are seen as resistant to social and technological changes.
- Evidence: While some studies suggest older adults can be more set in their ways, many Boomers have been active in progressive movements, including civil rights and environmental activism. A study by Deloitte found that Boomers are increasingly adopting digital banking and e-commerce, showing adaptability .
- Nuance: Resistance to change can be more about personality and less about age. Many Boomers embrace innovation and are active in community and political changes.
Generational Conflict
- Stereotype: Boomers are often accused of being out of touch with younger generations' values and struggles.
- Evidence: Generational conflict is a common narrative, with terms like "OK Boomer" encapsulating perceived intergenerational frustrations. Research by the Pew Research Center found significant generational differences in views on social issues like climate change and economic policy .
- Nuance: While there are differences, there is also significant common ground. Many Boomers are sympathetic to the challenges younger generations face and are supportive of policy changes that address these issues.
Conclusion
Stereotypes about Boomers, like any generational stereotypes, are overly simplistic and do not capture the diversity within the generation. While there is some evidence supporting certain generalizations, there is also ample evidence of Boomers' adaptability, activism, and understanding of modern challenges.
Sources
- Pew Research Center - Internet and Technology Usage by Age
- Pew Research Center - Older Adults and Technology Use
- Federal Reserve - Distribution of Household Wealth
- Deloitte - Digital Banking Adoption by Boomers
- Brookings Institution - Boomers and Social Movements
- Pew Research Center - Generational Differences in Views on Social Issues
- Pew Research Center - Generation Gaps and Climate Change
Stereotype: "Gen-Z Can't Answer the Most Basic Questions"
The stereotype that Generation Z (born approximately between 1997 and 2012) struggles with answering basic questions is frequently perpetuated by viral videos and media anecdotes. However, these portrayals often fail to represent the true capabilities and knowledge of this generation. Let's delve into the stereotype, its origins, and the evidence surrounding it.
Technologically Proficient but Lacking Basic Knowledge
- Stereotype: Gen-Z excels at using technology but lacks fundamental knowledge in areas like history or geography.
- Evidence: Viral videos showcasing individuals unable to answer basic questions often go viral, reinforcing this stereotype. However, these videos are not representative. According to a survey by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, while there are gaps in certain areas, this is not unique to Gen-Z but is indicative of broader educational trends .
- Nuance: Gen-Z's strengths lie in digital literacy, problem-solving, and quick information retrieval, which are critical skills in the modern world.
Dependent on Technology for Information
- Stereotype: Gen-Z relies too heavily on technology and lacks the ability to retain information.
- Evidence: A study by Pew Research Center indicates that while Gen-Z uses technology extensively, they are also highly adept at finding and verifying information online .
- Nuance: The ability to efficiently access and evaluate information is increasingly valuable. While methods of knowledge acquisition have changed, this does not equate to a lack of knowledge.
Lack of Practical Skills
- Stereotype: Gen-Z is seen as lacking practical life skills, such as cooking or financial literacy.
- Evidence: Research from the National Endowment for Financial Education suggests that younger generations, including Gen-Z, often seek out financial education and are keen on learning practical skills, despite sometimes lacking formal instruction .
- Nuance: Educational systems are evolving to include more practical life skills training. Moreover, many Gen-Z individuals use online resources to learn these skills independently.
Overly Dependent on Social Media and Trends
- Stereotype: Gen-Z is excessively influenced by social media trends and lacks independent critical thinking.
- Evidence: Studies show that while Gen-Z is heavily influenced by social media, they are also critical consumers of content. According to Common Sense Media, many young people are aware of the biases and pressures of social media and use it strategically for networking and information .
- Nuance: Social media literacy is an important skill, and Gen-Z often demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of digital landscapes.
Supporting Evidence and Research
- Educational Attainment: Data from the National Center for Education Statistics shows that high school graduation rates and college enrollment for Gen-Z are on the rise, indicating strong academic performance .
- Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving: Research from the American Psychological Association highlights that Gen-Z places a high value on critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are crucial for navigating the complexities of the modern world .
- Adaptability: A report by Deloitte notes that Gen-Z is highly adaptable and innovative, particularly in rapidly changing technological and economic environments .
Conclusion
The stereotype that Gen-Z can't answer basic questions is a reductive and misleading portrayal. While there are certainly areas where educational improvements are needed, Gen-Z demonstrates significant strengths in digital literacy, critical thinking, and adaptability. The challenges they face are often reflective of broader societal and educational shifts rather than an inherent lack of capability.
Sources
- American Council of Trustees and Alumni - Survey on Educational Gaps
- Pew Research Center - Technology Usage by Generation
- National Endowment for Financial Education - Financial Literacy and Young Adults
- Common Sense Media - Social Media Use by Generation
- National Center for Education Statistics - High School Graduation and College Enrollment Rates
- American Psychological Association - Gen-Z and Critical Thinking
- Deloitte - Gen-Z and Adaptability
Convert Youtube Video to Text | 3 Best Free Video to Text Converter
Based on the collective reviews and ratings from various sources, here's a summary of how well the speech-to-text services work for transcribing existing videos:
- YouTube Automatic Captions: 6.5/10 - While convenient, the automatic captions can be inaccurate, especially for videos with background noise or multiple speakers.
- Google Docs Voice Typing: 7.5/10 - Works well for clear audio, but may struggle with accents, background noise, or low-quality audio.
- Rev: 8.5/10 - High accuracy and fast turnaround times, but may require some editing for perfection.
- Trint: 8/10 - Strong accuracy and user-friendly interface, but may have occasional errors.
- GoTranscript: 7.5/10 - Good balance between accuracy and affordability, but may require some proofreading.
- Otter: 8/10 - Impressive accuracy and features, but may have occasional errors and limitations with very long files.
- VLC Media Player: 6/10 - Basic transcription capabilities, but may not be as accurate as dedicated speech-to-text services.
Please note that these ratings are based on a general consensus from various reviews and may not reflect your individual experience. The accuracy of transcription services can vary depending on the specific video, audio quality, and speaker characteristics.
Keep in mind that it's always a good idea to review and edit the transcriptions to ensure accuracy, regardless of the service used.
Based on the collective reviews and ratings from various sources, here's a summary of how well the speech-to-text services work for transcribing existing videos:
- YouTube Automatic Captions: 6.5/10 - While convenient, the automatic captions can be inaccurate, especially for videos with background noise or multiple speakers.
- Google Docs Voice Typing: 7.5/10 - Works well for clear audio, but may struggle with accents, background noise, or low-quality audio.
- Rev: 8.5/10 - High accuracy and fast turnaround times, but may require some editing for perfection.
- Trint: 8/10 - Strong accuracy and user-friendly interface, but may have occasional errors.
- GoTranscript: 7.5/10 - Good balance between accuracy and affordability, but may require some proofreading.
- Otter: 8/10 - Impressive accuracy and features, but may have occasional errors and limitations with very long files.
- VLC Media Player: 6/10 - Basic transcription capabilities, but may not be as accurate as dedicated speech-to-text services.
Please note that these ratings are based on a general consensus from various reviews and may not reflect your individual experience. The accuracy of transcription services can vary depending on the specific video, audio quality, and speaker characteristics.
Keep in mind that it's always a good idea to review and edit the transcriptions to ensure accuracy, regardless of the service used.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)